[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Asimov Site
- Subject: Re: Asimov Site
- From: "Frank Townsend" <ftownsen@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 03:22:55 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Intermedia iAmerica - http://www.iamworld.net
- References: <967237775.39a6e08f725d6@webmail.cotse.com> <8o80ah$jcq$1@merope.saaf.se> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000826103630.1365D-100000@step.mother.com> <39A8848F.3D78FA28@inetnebr.com> <FB1q5.73133$rd1.12679913@typhoon-news1.southeast.rr.com> <39A9B9EF.8E5357EC@inetnebr.com> <39a9d4ad@naylor.cs.rmit.edu.au> <Yglq5.75218$rd1.13164173@typhoon-news1.southeast.rr.com> <39ac1d1c.94088868@24.9.0.17> <PtXq5.213$gg.242649@typhoon.southeast.rr.com> <39ade7c4.93586708@24.9.0.17> <vSur5.5434$Oc.865826@typhoon.southeast.rr.com> <39b2a682.932116@24.9.0.17> <GlEs5.11579$gg.3185455@typhoon.southeast.rr.com> <39bd385d.5820686@24.9.0.17> <M9ev5.705$Lh2.135533@typhoon.southeast.rr.com>
- Xref: supernews.google.com comp.sys.apple2:1485
Jeff is correct.
Here is just one example. I take a photo of the Mona Lisa and I own the
copyright. You may also take a photo to which you own the copyright. Both
photos may look identical but neither infringes the other.
"**** ****" <***@***.com> wrote in message
news:M9ev5.705$Lh2.135533@typhoon.southeast.rr.com...
> >By the way, it is also possible for an identical work to exist if it
> >can be proven that it was created without using the original work.
>
>
> This isn't true to my knowledge. And even if it is technically true, it
> would still go to court, and the person who happens to to be the
established
> "copyright holder" would succeed in banning the other from using and/or
> distributing such a work.