[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)

Subject: Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
From: Phoenyx <quazar@dcnet2000.com>
Date: 2000/05/30
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Verio
References: <392C22E6.CE9AD914@mcw.edu> <392C3B2A.684EEF7@inetnebr.com> <392C4B2F.18A8F97A@intergate.bc.ca> <393348EC.B0E9515A@pacific.net.au>

The primary benefit for me is the speed boost to Hyper C. The
16 bit interpreter is probably 30% faster. Since I like to tinker
around with utilities, this is useful for me, especially with the
extra mhz.

-- 

Thank you for your time and interest. I hope it was helpful
or at least interesting.

Phoenyx,

Apple2 user since March 1984

Links to Phoenyx's pages:
preferred..... http://zip.to/Phoenyx_A2
alternate..... http://www.tinyangeldesigns.com/Apple2

References:
- 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
  - From: Ron Kneusel <rkneusel@mcw.edu>
- Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
  - From: Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>
- Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
  - From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@intergate.bc.ca>
- Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
  - From: Matt Jenkins <mdj@pacific.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Asimov Mirror Sites Access Information
Next by Date: Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
Previous by thread: Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
Next by thread: Re: 65816 in a IIe? (or, buddy, can you spare a 65802?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread