Re: Usenet Posts, P.D. or ©? = Thoughts or Court Ruling

["Quantum_Cat" <anonymous@cotse.com>]

Dr. Charles "Tom" Turley turns his head and coughs:

 *>a2mg@aol.comNomail rwrote in her new subject post:
 *>"x-no-archive: yes"

I'm hoping there's a "x-no-turley: YES" option.  ;)

 *>Well,  I'm glad to see you put that back in your post Bev 
:) Don't worry
 *>dear...I won't EVER archive any post from YOU. But, I 
don't think the

Quit your kidding, Tom... We all know you lie and that your 
word is worth less than organic fertilizer.

 *>"x-no-archive: yes" insert is going to prevent 
professional online Usenet
 *>newsgroup services from archiving your post to "this 
forum" as you refer to
 *>it.  They still seem to be showing up in many such 
professional online 
 *>Usenet newsgroup services, even the most current of your 
post!

You appear to be confused with the term "archiving", Tom.  
Odd, since you base your claim to fame on "archiving" 
software against the wishes of the owners of said software.

It doesn't mean it won't show (duh!).. It means it won't show 
up in a search after a suitable delay... 

 *>"Tom, I didn't read all your gobbledygook but we can 
easily solve the
 *>problem simply by not posting here any more. Either you 
respect our wishes
 *>not to be quoted without permission (...please take that 
TO.Calendar quote
 *>down...), or we simply won't add our two cents to the 
discussion any more. "

 *>.....gobbledygook indeed.  So that's what you call it.  
How rude of you! I
 
Yeah!  I agree with this 100%, Tom!  Gobbledygook indeed!  
Your gibberish shouldn't be classed as gobbledygook!

 *>could say the same thing about some of your past ramblings 
and chatter, on

Heh... You could say "I'm telling the truth!", and no one 
would believe you, Tom.

 *>this newsgroup with your past postings -> but, I don't.  i 
will say this

I could say you're a festering subhuman tapeworm -> but, I 
don't.

 *>though... Your really getting hot under the collar about 
not to much of
 *>nothing lately.  What's your problem anyway?  Paranoid 
that somebody  in the
 *>elitist A2 circle will relate you to me and abandon 
support to you, most
 *>like - I'd guess. 

Translation:  "Elitist A2 Circle" - A dwindling group of 
Apple II enthusiasts who refuse to join lying thieves in 
their festering pool of sewage.

 *>you said: "Either you respect our wishes not to be quoted 
without permission
 *>(...please take that TO.Calendar quote down...), or we 
simply won't add our
 *>two cents to the discussion any more. "  

 *>The content words; our and we - my my Bev.  When did you 
become the official
 *>spokes-person and moderator for this newsgroup?  I thought 
CSA2 was an
 
Yeah, Bev.. Don't you know that Tom and the Turlettes are the 
only ones allowed to express their opinions on this forum?  
For shame!

 *>opened, public and non-moderated newsgroup.  When did it 
change?  As to my
 *>quoting your post without permission, to the best of my 
knowledge I have

Oh oh... If we have to rely on the "best of your knowledge", 
we wouldn't be able to find our butts with both hands.  

 *>respected your wishes to that effect ever sense you made 
me aware of it

Me!  Me!  Can _I_ make a wish that you'd respect, Tommy?

 *>many. many months ago. And your comment: "(...please take 
that TO.Calendar
 *>quote down...) 

 *>Ref. URL:

 *>http://www.grin.net/~cturley/gsezine/GS.WorldView/v2000/
Feb/Articles/AwksT
 *>OcalY2kupdate.htm

 *>That is an html document that WAS NOT done by me.  It WAS 
MADE and  placed
 *>in the GS WorldView Feb2000 issue --LAST MONTH- by 
Rubywand. I DID NOT
 *>create it thus - I WILL NOT remove it.  You should address 
such a request
 *>directly to Rubywand and not to me.  Is that understood?

Might I make a suggestion, Butthead?  If you have a site that 
you make available to your fellow thieves, you can't escape 
responsibility for their actions on that site.  

Stop cowering behind them, loser.

 *>It is a LEGAL and FAIR USE quote and is simply an effort 
to promote a
 *>commercial service you offer from your web site - with a 
polite  composition
 *>and a sincere link to your web site.  You have a problem 
with that - then
 *>take it up with Rubywand.

Typical.  Pass the buck... "Somebody sent this to me".  "I 
didn't upload that... someone broke into my house and did 
it.."

 *>"This issue has been around since early Genie, and after 
quite a long
 *>argument, we all thought it was resolved. People either 
gave a blanket
 *>"yes," a blanket "no," or requested an inquiry in each 
case. Get with the
 *>program, please. We don't care what is legal. It is a 
simple courtesy."

 *>I AM WITH THE PROGRAM DEAR!  IT"S TIME FOR ***YOU*** TO 
GET WITH THE PROGRAM
 *>OR ELSE DUMP IT AND GET OFF THE POT - SO TO SPEAK!!!

Getting peeved, Turley?  Better get off the pot, so Tom can 
smoke it..

 *>"Also, when you change the subject name, the old or new 
subject messages can
 *>get lost for AOL users. They are hard to find for replying 
later. It's
 *>better to start a totally new topic, which I just did."

 *>Well, as the Church Lady of Saturday Night Live might say:  
Isn't that 
 *>SPECIAL!   Strange Bev, I read this newsgroup from my AOL 
service also and
 *>I've had no problem with finding a changed subject name.  
But, then I use a
 *>Mac and not a PC :)  Seems, many problems result with the 
use of a PC from
 *>AOL.
 *> I sure glad I still use an Apple computer and haven't 
sold out to the PC
 *>world YET! 

Say... if I gave you $1,000,000 would you sell out to the PC 
world?


Quantum_Cat

-- 
Anon news web interface.  FAQ available for review at:
http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi