[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: Any new GSoft programs?
- Subject: Re: Q: Any new GSoft programs?
- From: phoenyx <phoenyx@texas.net>
- Date: 1999/11/08
- Followup-to: comp.sys.apple2
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: -
- References: <7t0uu9$q68$1@sylvester.vcn.bc.ca> <38043D00.10DD3873@swbell.net> <3807C0AF.8AA1D2B8@texas.net> <380a21a1.58535309@news> <7ugnl0$t7j$1@news.rt66.com>
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Mike Westerfield wrote:
Somehow, my first response to this got lost in transit.
Sorry, Mike. I wasn't trying to disparrage Gsoft. It's a nice interpreter. I
have tested the free version. If I could afford the cost of Gsoft and the GS
manuals to make system calls, I might consider it. Currently, I can't
justify the price for my hobby.
>There is a big difference between someone's spare-time project and a full
>commercial product developed for a specific platform. For some applications,
>the difference isn't important, but for the majority I think it is.
>
>And, for what it's worth, we have a free version of our BASIC, too. It
>can't create stand-alone programs (but neither can Applesoft or, I suspect,
>CallBox) and it's limited to 64K. Give it a try.
>
BTW, Call box can make stand alone desktop programs.
Phoenyx