[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)




Chris Hedley wrote:
> 
> In article <xlxyafmif0u.fsf@gold.cis.ohio-state.edu>,
>         Matt Curtin <cmcurtin@interhack.net> writes:
> > A few (obvious?) candidates:
> 
> 
> >  int *laser;
> 
> Er, this one I really just don't get at all.  Anyone want to explain it?

I think it means "laser pointer", but it would be more "funny" IMO if it
was:

laser *i;

Cheers,
MvdW