[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)

Subject: Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
From: hshubs@mindspring.com (Howard S Shubs)
Date: 1999/08/10
Mail-copies-to: never
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers, comp.arch.embedded, comp.sys.apple2
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
References: <7of2b2$ka2$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca> <37ad55ed@195.34.192.13> <7okklr$irv$0@216.39.144.179> <hshubs-0808991501340001@user-33qsc6i.dialup.mindspring.com> <7okud9$agt$0@216.39.144.179> <hshubs-0808991800100001@user-33qsd3m.dialup.mindspring.com> <7ol7vc$3np$0@216.39.144.179> <hshubs-0808992118550001@user-33qsc4d.dialup.mindspring.com> <7oln21$6dq$0@216.39.144.179> <hshubs-0908990927550001@user-33qscqg.dialup.mindspring.com> <7on4i0$b47$0@216.39.144.179> <BPHr3.57359$jl.36504684@newscontent-01.sprint.ca> <7onil2$8ne$0@216.39.144.179> <qhn1w0uv5u.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

In article <qhn1w0uv5u.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>, Eric Smith
<eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com> wrote:

>So if (1-P/100)*X is greater than (P/100)*Z, the choice is obviously to
>spend the money on marketing.

You'd think they'd have learned the lesson Ford got the hard way: Pinto.
-- 
Howard S Shubs      hshubs@mindspring.com    hshubs@bix.com
The Denim Adept     Is this the right room for an argument?
SPAM: uce@ftc.gov   postmaster@[127.0.0.1]   abuse@[127.0.0.1]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: "Ian St. John" <istjohn@spamcop.net>

References:
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: gillies@cs.ubc.ca (Donald Gillies)
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: "Ruff Records" <ruffrecords@geocities.com>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: hshubs@mindspring.com (Howard S Shubs)
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: hshubs@mindspring.com (Howard S Shubs)
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: hshubs@mindspring.com (Howard S Shubs)
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: hshubs@mindspring.com (Howard S Shubs)
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: "Ian St. John" <istjohn@spamcop.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net>
- Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
  - From: Eric Smith <eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com>

Prev by Date: Re: not enough real programmers?
Next by Date: Re: not enough real programmers?
Previous by thread: Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
Next by thread: Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread