No class

[Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>]

maxjones@indy.net writes ...
> 
> In article <37A94938.4C865536@swbell.net>,
>   rubywand@swbell.net wrote:
 ....
> 
> >      Feel free to apologize.
> 
> Ooooh. Rubywand likes to dish it out, but he can't take it.


     See? That's why no one has to devise any devious plot to make you and
your associates 'look bad'.


You post the following ...

> IMO, Turley (and his lapdog Rudywand) knew exactly what they were doing
> when they lifted those posts from Delphi without asking permission and
> compiled them for their own use.


     The above claims are untrue. Giving you the benefit of the doubt and not
just calling you a liar, my response was to inform you of the truth:


>>
     I did not lift anything from any of the KF threads or contribute
anything at all to Dr. Tom's fine report. (Actually, did not even read
the report until it was published.)
<<


And, even better, you were offered you an opportunity to correct your error
and show a bit of class:

>>
     Feel free to apologize.
<<


     Instead of admitting your error and offering an apology, the best you
can manage is schoolyard bully nonsense:

> Ooooh. Rubywand likes to dish it out, but he can't take it.


     This shows your true attitude about issues like libel and rights. You no
more care about "rights" to publicly posted chats than you care about posting
lies.

     It is transparently obvious that the only reason for attacking Dr. Tom's
report is that it was from Dr. Tom.


     Again, regarding ...

> They knew exactly the type of reaction they would get, and got it.
> That was the plan.
 ....

     No one has to plan anything. You do it to yourself.



Rubywand