Re: Revenge of the Y2K Bug?

[Doug Browning <wpg750@mb.imag.net>]

Actually, the year 2000 IS a leap year. Beginning with that year, EVERY four years
is a leap year. The divisable by 400 rule no longer applys because the calendar is
now on track and only requires a additional day every 4 years to maintain
accuracy.

Ludowick wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> Do you think any Apple II software will have problems because the year 2000
> isn't a leap year (it is divisible by 400)?  The date can be advanced to March
> 1, but could that confuse some programs into also changing the day of the week
> (i.e. Tuesday becomes Wednesday)?
>
> Just wondering...
>
> Harry Protagonis (Ludowick)



--
Doug Browning
dougbrow@mb.imag.net
www.mb.imag.net/~wpg750