[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
Subject
: Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From
: Liam Busey <
liam1@ix.netcom.com
>
Date
: 1999/01/14
Newsgroups
:
comp.sys.apple2
Organization
: Netcom
References
: <
19990102234330.22024.00006851@ng114.aol.com
> <
3692b323.2690093@news.bconnex.net
> <76v9j3$u1u$2@lynx.unm.edu> <
369906dc.5304617@news.bconnex.net
> <
369D0AB8.581F@terra.cira.colostate.edu
> <
369D80C5.199D2D35@Concentric.net
>
Reply-to
:
liam1@ix.netcom.com
Gabriel Morales wrote: > > What about an AppleCD SC Drive? How fast are they? No more than 2X.
References
:
CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From:
sagochangi@aol.com (Sagochangi)
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From:
CUTjefbla@bconnex.net (Jeff Blakeney)
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From:
buggie@ben11.unm.edu (stephen e buggie)
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From:
CUTjefbla@bconnex.net (Jeff Blakeney)
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From:
Jeff Lemke <lemke@terra.cira.colostate.edu>
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
From:
Gabriel Morales <Togega@Concentric.net>
Prev by Date:
Re: Aargh! Goodbye HD...
Next by Date:
Re: IIgs...long delay and monitor glitches
Previous by thread:
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
Next by thread:
Re: CD-ROMs: a theoretical upper limit?
Index(es):
Date
Thread