Re: ProDOS and the Y2K (year 2000)

[david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)]

>Pim Blokland <pDOTblokland@spcgroup.nl> wrote:

>> Randy Shackelford wrote:
>> 
>> > Well considering that a zero year field is an invalid date for ProDOS,
>> > I'd say
>> 
>> Is it? I thought that only an entirely empty date field was a problem.
>> This occurs only on January 1, 2000. It will be gone on the second day.
>> I need to check this.

I would have thought that only 0/0/00 would display as <NO DATE> while
1/1/00 would be quite valid. I guess I should try this out.

This does not work for times - 00:00 is quite valid (it is midnight).
--
David Wilson  School of IT & CS, Uni of Wollongong, Australia  david@uow.edu.au