Re: visi.com - the lost email complaint?

[Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>]

Mike Horwath writes ...
> 
> Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net> wrote:
> : Mike Horwath writes ...
> :>
> :> Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net> wrote:
> :> :      For the record, on 4/10/98 a message was sent to youe ISP at
> :> : abuse@visi.com regarding lies and slander about "piracy" made via your
> :> : visi.com account. Documentation (in the form of postings by you) was
> :> : attached.
> :>
> :> Well, I don't frequent comp.sys.apple2 enough I see...
> :>
> :> I never received this message...
> :>
> :> I have archives dating back 4+ years for abuse email for winternet.com
> :> (when I ran that) and visi.com and I do not find your name in there
> :> for April 10th, 1998.
> 
> :      This kind of thing is, of course, precisely why notice of the
> : sending was placed on public record.
> 
> Your so-called headers below don't mean all that much without some
> message IDs attached.

     That is too bad. Just for the public record and to avoid any
possible ambiguity:

     When you say "I never received this message..." does this mean that
neither you nor anyone who might normally deal with messages to
abuse@visi.com had any knowledge of my message or of its arrival in the
span 9 April 1998 through 12 April 1998?


You say:

>>

I have archives dating back 4+ years for abuse email for winternet.com
(when I ran that) and visi.com and I do not find your name in there
for April 10th, 1998.

<<

     Did you or anyone associated with you delete my original message?

     Did my original message arrive on some date other than 10 April
1998 or with a dating other than 10 April 1998?

     Did my original message arrive at all?


     Since, as of 1 May 1998, you appear to claim no knowledge of my
original message, how is it that you discovered its existence and came
to post to Csa2?


 ....          


> 
> :      The email was re-sent a few minutes ago. Try not to lose it.
> 
> I got it and already responded.
> 
> Next time, leave the Mr. Turley references out of the email, it
> doesn't help your case and makes you look like a whiner.


     Tsk. As a prospective future employee, it would be best to avoid
insulting references to a potential part owner of a renewed visi.com.

     Nevertheless, it is good of you to at least mention Mr. Turley. It
helps to confirm that visi.com is well informed regarding all aspects of
the original complaint.


Rubywand