Re: Why some people have stable AWGS

[Rich Hare <rhare@mich.com>]

For what it's worth,
I always found AWGS stable on my ROM 3 machine.
I'll have to admit I never pushed it to its limits, and I was always
wary and ready for a crash (saved often), but never seemed to have the
problems many described.


     () ()
Rich ('-')


Supertimer wrote:
> 
> nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates) wrote:
> 
> >Supertimer <supertimer@aol.com> wrote:
> >>I am trying to find out why some people have no trouble with
> >>AWGS and why it crashes so much for other people.  I think
> >>part of the answer is the SANE patch I found in my system.
> >
> >  AWGS wordprocessor does not use SANE, and is still quite crashable,
> >ProDOS 8, GS/OS, or anything else.
> 
> Well, there has got to be SOME reason my system is stable.  I found
> another patch in my system, one that fixes a memory trashing bug.
> 
> But let's say one sets AWGS to preload all modules.  Would the
> simple loading of the database and spreadsheet modules along with
> the word processor be enough to trigger the SANE bug while using
> just the word processor.  I am just trying to find out why my system
> is stable...so that the information can help other AWGS users.
> 
> I know it could be some other init or extension that is in some other
> people's system that causes their systems to crash, but eliminating
> reasons one by one is a start in figuring out the culprit.