[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Apple II?



In article <34C456A5.C6F47135@direct.ca>,
Troy Perchotte  <tperchot@_direct.ca> wrote:
>I'm curious to know why people here are still using Apple II computers,
>particularily the 8-bit machines?

   I kinda prefer the 16-bit IIGS personally, but it's still an Apple
II.

>Can someone give me just a couple of reasons.  I know that it can't be
>money, since older 386's sell as paperweights.  Not performance nor
>popularity.  Is it then just for sentimental reasons? :-/

   Compared to the bloated code from Microsoft running on most 386s
and 486s, Apple IIs are fairly fast. [However, with a real OS like
linux, an 386/40 is pretty speedy] It's not necessarily raw speed,
it's also perceived speed. Also, Apple IIs are real easy to program
and allow you to get to know all about the system, while some PCs and
especially Macs would like nothing better than to prevent you from
thinking about the machine and programming on it. Basically, they're
fast enough, user friendly (and not simply by putting up a point and
drool user interface), and programmer friendly.

Nathan Mates

--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? -R.A. Heinlein