[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lanpress
Dave Althoff <dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us> wrote:
> Phil Beesley (PB14@le.ac.uk) wrote:
>
> (after noting that a Lanpress or other printer gateway wouldn't work)
>
> : One plug-in box that *might* work is the Farallon Etherwave that plugs
> : into a Mac LocalTalk port to connect it to an ethernet network. These do
> : work on the Mac but are noticeably slower than a proper ethernet
> : interface. However you would need to write a driver for the device,
> : assuming you could get enough info on how it worked.
>
> Noticeably slower makes sense; if I remember correctly, Ethernet is
> 10,000,000 bits/second while LocalTalk is 57,600 bits/second.
LocalTalk is 230,400 bps (and is synchronous, so has less overhead than
asynchronous comms as used with modems). Note that Ethernet and
LocalTalk speeds are theoretical limits - due to the protocol
requirements, you cannot actually achieve this level of throughput over
any useful period (more than one frame).
--
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz
Snail mail: P.O. Box 27-103, Wellington, New Zealand
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lanpress
- From: dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff)
- References:
- Lanpress
- From: khorster@injersey.com (Karl Horster)
- Re: Lanpress
- From: PB14@le.ac.uk (Phil Beesley)
- Re: Lanpress
- From: dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff)