[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IIgs emulation...
- Subject: Re: IIgs emulation...
- From: alelee@hna.com.au (Alex Lee)
- Date: 1997/11/30
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: FrameWork Design
- References: <19971126040800.XAA19618@ladder01.news.aol.com> <65o1md$3te@mtinsc02.worldnet.att.net> <65pscd$3ns$42@news.vanderbilt.edu>
> The only problem with XGS (at least on the Mac) is that if you've got
> sound turned on with any decent demo, it slows down to a crawl, even
> compared with a real IIGS.
>
> And that's on one of the new Mac G3's (233MHz) !
>
> For example, Modulae is TEN times (10x) faster on an unaccelerated IIGS
> than it is on a 233MHz XGS Mac.
>
> The real answer to the original question is that a IIGS is better than
> an emulator.
There's an easy solution to this: use Bernie ][ the Rescue instead of XGS
on a Mac. And THEN see how fast you can emulate a IIgs. At a guess, the
emulated IIgs would run at speeds far greater than a real IIgs could ever
cope with, if emulated with a PowerMac G3. I'm currently using the near 4
year old PowerMac 7100 and I'm emulating a IIgs with Bernie roughly
equivelant to my own 8Mhz Zipped IIgs. Not to mention that Bernie has
more features than XGS and far greater compatibility. Why use anything
else? :-)
> --
> __ __|_) | |
> | | | _` | \ ` \ _` | \
> _| _|_|\__, |_| _|_|_|_|\__,_|_| _|
> ____/
LaTeR!