Re: OS For IIGS

[spec@vax2.concordia.ca (Mitchell Spector)]

In article airmaster@KCUF.org writes...

>On 25 Nov 1997 16:19 -0500, spec@vax2.concordia.ca (Mitchell Spector) wrote:
>
>>>KCUF airmaster (airmaster@KCUF.org) wrote:
>>>: The Mac is just an art-deco paperweight.
>>>
>>>If this is true, then a Windoze machine is a waste of the metal
>>>of which it is made.
>>>
>>>I currently work on computer sales at a major American university.
>>>The computers, in terms of functionality, go like this:  UNIX, Mac,
>>>Windoze.  In that order, from top to bottom.  When UNIX crashes (well,
>>>actually, it hasn't yet).  When the Mac crashes, we reboot.  When
>>>the Windoze machine crashes, we get a technician from service to spend
>>>three hours trying to even _diagnose_ the problem.  And the Windoze
>>>machines
> 
>You're hallucinating.  I work on both platforms all the time and for stability,
>the Windows platforms are superior in _every_ way.  I can't imagine calling a
>Macintosh "functional" and not calling myself "incompetent" in the same breath
>for saying so!

    Be careful when you attribute quoted lines of text, I did _not_
write the above, Tilghman Lesher did. If you go back in the thread
you'll see I responsed to his comments and stated how I felt quite
strongly against what he said.

Mitchell Spector
spec@vax2.concordia.ca