[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OS For IIGS

Subject: Re: OS For IIGS
From: markem@flash.net (Mark Manning)
Date: 1997/11/22
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Simulacron I
References: <640tm3$q7f$1@News.Dal.Ca> <6426ns$koo$1@europa.frii.com> <3466411E.3E88@library.ucla.edu> <346f47ac.73214424@news.loop.com> <652sj2$ge2$6@news.vanderbilt.edu>

In article <652sj2$ge2$6@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
retromod-Apple-II-newsgroups; rm -rf ~;@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Tilghman
Lesher) wrote:

> And strangely enough, prices for the Macs which are functionally
> equivalent to a Windoze machine are actually LOWER than the Windoze
> machines.  From my experience, it is pretty clear that the people who
> continue to buy Windoze machines are either forced to by their superiors
> or else they are mentally incompetant.

Actually the whole deal is that the Windows Machines have a better PR
machine in place than the Macs.

References:
- Re: OS For IIGS
  - From: ab616@chebucto.ns.ca (Tony Cianfaglione)
- Re: OS For IIGS
  - From: shack@io.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)
- Re: OS For IIGS
  - From: pubpc1@library.ucla.edu
- Re: OS For IIGS
  - From: airmaster@KCUF.org (KCUF airmaster)
- Re: OS For IIGS
  - From: retromod-Apple-II-newsgroups; rm -rf ~;@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Tilghman Lesher)

Prev by Date: What RAMDisk Card works with Laser 128?
Next by Date: Re: New to IItelecom. Can you help?
Previous by thread: Re: OS For IIGS
Next by thread: Re: OS For IIGS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread