Re: Macs and clones

[Nanci <NGHH@worldnet.att.net>]

Udo Huth wrote:
> 
> Davide Frada <davidef@dove.net.au> wrote:
> >       THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THE APPLE II's WERE FAR SUPERIOR TO ANY MACS OR
> > MAC CLONES AND I WOULD RATHER USE A VIC 20 THAN AN APPLE MAC OR COMPATIBLE.
> Not to start a flame war... but, face reality man.
> I worked over nine years with a IIGS exclusively. Then the TransWarp
> died and circumstances asked for a PowerBook.

I *love* my IIGS's.....but only in the classroom. I think I 
would go crazy working on it at home. In the classroom I can 
do so much more cheaper. I can hook my VCR up to it and 
document work done by the students so the parents can see 
their progress.

But at home....Oh I love my MAC! I started with the old SE 
then to a LCII then an LCIII then a Performa 636CD, now I 
have a Permorma 7200. I HATE my IBM's. Probably because I 
don't use them enough to get to know them better.

> First I bought a PowerBook
> 150 then a PowerBook 190cs. Everything can be done on a 
> Mac faster and
> easier than on a 2.8 MHz IIGS, 

Yep, he's right.


Nanci:)