[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macs and clones
- Subject: Re: Macs and clones
- From: udo.huth@auge.de (Udo Huth)
- Date: 1997/10/07
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Apple IIGS Arbeitsgemeinschaft
- References: <01bbfe2b$ce407440$9a1e0fcb@sex-drive>
Davide Frada <davidef@dove.net.au> wrote:
> I would like to say that ALL macs and clones are rubbish. I have got a
> $9000 powerbook and compared to a 386 dx 40 it is bloody slow. Prices are
> terrible too, I can get an IBM compat. note book (166MMX, 32mb RAM, etc,
> etc.) for $2300.
> THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THE APPLE II's WERE FAR SUPERIOR TO ANY MACS OR
> MAC CLONES AND I WOULD RATHER USE A VIC 20 THAN AN APPLE MAC OR COMPATIBLE.
Not to start a flame war... but, face reality man.
I worked over nine years with a IIGS exclusively. Then the TransWarp
died and circumstances asked for a PowerBook. First I bought a PowerBook
150 then a PowerBook 190cs. Everything can be done on a Mac faster and
easier than on a 2.8 MHz IIGS, sorry, but so it is.
My PowerBook 190 even outruns the Windows NT box with a 133 MHz Pentium
in the office.
So stop telling lies, please.
Udo