Re: No truce without a surrender and retreat: Mentzer's

[smentzer@pacbell.net (Steve Mentzer)]

>As I detailed yesterday, Steve Mentzer is in posession of a large
>body of copyrighted (which should be enough) *and* currently sold
>software (thus by his actions demolishing the mask of "I'm a nice
>guy and only steal from the really dead"), and has posted it to
>the internet last year and claims to be still doing so but less
>publically.


When did I ever claim that I am still distributing commercially available 
software? I think you have some wires crossed upstairs nathan. As far as the 
stuff that was uploaded last week or so, I dont have any of that software in 
my posession. I have no clue as to what those programs even do, nor do I have 
a way to transfer them to a real IIgs even if I had the software.

The fact is that I am in no posession of any commercially available software 
for the Apple IIgs. I didn't upload the software to the newsgroup, and I don't 
agree with whoever did it.


>   He started this round of flamefests by pirating plenty of software,
>*INCLUDING* what everyone got so upset about a week ago.  He continues
>to espouse piracy in all forms by his actions. And he has the gall to
>even try and say "I win; let's just have a truce"?


Ok Nathan, so you ARE implicating me in the uploading of the latest group of 
software to these newsgroups. Now, can you provide any proof? No, I didn't 
think so. And you know why you cannot provide any proof?  SUPRISE NATHAN! I 
didn't do it. I had nothing to do with it... haha. jokes on you. 

Once again, you go on a witch hunt. Unfortunately you have the wrong witch.

Now, if you can't understand any of this, you are an even bigger moron that I 
originally though.


>   Not a chance, slimeball. There'll be a truce when your body leaves
>the battlefield permanently. Not before.

So, let me get this straight:

	1 - I didn't pirate the software the other day, even though
	    you repeatadly say that I did (without fact of course).
	2 - Even though the document that I posted has merit, you
	    refuse to accept it because I am still around.

It sounds like you plan on plaguing the apple II community indefinitely for 
your own personal vengance. Now it sounds like you are the bad one here, not 
me. I am willing to forget past transgressions and move forward, and we can 
agree on some common ground. But you dont want that.

I dont understand nathan.... I thought you wanted GOOD to come to the apple II 
community. Maybe I was wrong....


smentzer@pacbell.net