[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wordperfect



In article <5gtoel$grl$7@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
>: "Scott G."
>
>: Is there a human in the world that doesn't know that you are actually
>: Charles Turley teleneting in from SF to LA and posting these bogus
>: posts?
>
>: ScottG/Chuck now asks us to believe that the U.S. Postoffice and the
>: EVIL Nathan Mates duped "poor Scott G."
>
>: Get a life Chuck and leave Apple ][ forever as we have asked over and
>: over and you have promised over and over to do.
>
>Joe-
>
>Occam's Razor would tend to suggest that the simpler explanation
>(that Scott G. is a totally different person) is probably the
>correct one.
>
>Come on, now.  When have you EVER seen Turley post with a
>separate identity or claimed he was someone else?

>As long as I've been around, he's always posted either under
>his OWN identity or his ORGANIZATIONAL identity.

Three things convinced me:

1. Turley the WP freeware announcement.

2. Almost immediately the long and detailed WP article 
   appeared under Scott G's name.

3. The way Scott G posts are clumped together. I think Chuck
   is either telneting from SF or simply calling LA from
   SF and dumping a bunch of posts at once.

4. The tone/style that Scott G ripped Nathan when he initially
   brought up the subject that the letter from Quality might
   be bogus. Go back and read it. Vintage Turley.

5. The cop-out that some evil person or persons unknown had
   duped Scott G. Chuck has used this one over and over.
   Said evil person having the name Diablo is too much.

6. The way Scott G disappeared from the scene when the scam was
   unmasked. Again, vintage Turley. It gets to the point that you
   begin to believe (hope) that he is gone forever and then in a puff
   of yellow smoke he appears once again.

7. Can anyone that has been around the net and NOT a Turley
   supporter attest that they personally know Scott G?
   Given the high and broad level of his knowledge he didn't
   fall off the turnip truck yesterday.

   Nobody should dispute Chuck's knowledge and access to useful
   information. It is his penchant for putting his hand in
   living, breating programmers/publishers pockets on a continuing
   basis that gets folks upset.

8. My fervant hope that Turley has not been cloned.

Kind Regards,
--
	Joe Walters:  bird@mcs.net
	To know and not to do is to not yet know