Re: Offline HTML Editor?

[cheer@i.hate.spam (Christopher D. Heer)]

It was 22 Feb 1997 20:28:06 GMT.  I was reading instead of working.  And Nathan 
Mates <nathan@visi.com> said:

>In article <5elcmt$n5n@inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>,
>Christopher D. Heer <cheer@i.hate.spam> wrote:

>>Don't think he asked for a value assessment of HTML editors as a class of 
>>application, Nathan; merely if one was available for the //gs.  If the answer 
>>is "no," why can't you just say that?

>   If you bother to read what I said, I said "No, but XYZ does the job
>just as well to better." Though I wouldn't be surprised if I'd just
>said "No" you or someone else desperate for a flame might have said
>"why didn't you tell him any alternatives."

Wasn't commenting on the actual advice so much (although, really, it's value is 
somewhat questionable; I expect he knew a generic text editor could be used) 
but the tone, which was (IMHO) sarcastic and rude.  And undeserved.
-- 
          Christopher D. Heer - cheer at us dot oracle dot com
     My opinions are my own and do not reflect those of Oracle Corp.
    SPAMProtect: You'll need to fix my email address before replying.