[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: oz dos or az dos???
- Subject: Re: oz dos or az dos???
- From: tilghman@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Tilghman Lesher)
- Date: 1996/11/01
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
- References: <54uar5$fom@kirin.wwa.com> <54ui0f$iog@cello.gina.calstate.edu> <558ot0$m0s@rock101.genie.net>
richard.b@genie.com wrote:
: Just to correct you...
: >OzDos (shareware or freeware) allows two 400k Dos 3.3 volumes on a 3.5 disk.
: It was commercial from 1984 up until around 1992, when it was re-released as
: freeware.
: If the original Oz DOS archive had made it out of Genie in one piece,
: instead of some low life simply re-upping the binary image to the 'net, then
: people would know better.
: >AmDos (commercial) does also, and is a better operating system.
: In what ways? Most3.5" DOSs which came out (there are around five or so of
: them) were all pretty much the same. Oz DOS comes with a lot more options
: and programmer functions than most of the others, but the bottom line is
: that they're all DOS 3.3, the SAME operating system.
Is there a patch available to allow the DOS3.3 FST to recognize OZ-DOS
disks?
--
__ __|_) | |
| | | _` | \ ` \ _` | \
_| _|_|\__, |_| _|_|_|_|\__,_|_| _|
____/