Re: New IIgs Accelerator.... Wow!

[madmax_2069@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (madmax2069)]

 > > On Jun 11, 4:34ï¿œam, madmax_2...@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
 > > (madmax2069) wrote:
 > > 
 > > i asked them they should consider a card design over a drop in
CPU
 > > replacement They said they we will be glad to accept my input
with an
 > > enclosed resume, and if i don't like it there is always ebay. and
they
 > > further told me that without a complete resume and long term
 > > experience in the design and electronics field from myself I am
 > > afraid that we cannot accept your input.
 > > 
 > > As for your skepticism, we have opted not to share information
about
 > > the design specifications with the community, as IT IS NOT an
open
 > > source project.
 > > 
 > > but no, sad really because i was looking forward too this in a
way but
 > > not now.
 > > 
 > James Littlejohn wrote:
 > 
 > 
 > ROTFLMAO !
 > 
 > I can't believe that you would ask them to scrap their design and
 > configure a card to meet your specs. How many were you going to
buy?
 > LOL
 > 
 > I have been following all this accelerator info just like everyone
 > else, and I for one think it is great. We, as a community, don't
have
 > many options when it comes to accelerators for the IIgs, either
 > Transwarp IIgs or Zip XGS. Good luck finding either at a decent
price.
 > 
 > As someone that makes hardware for the Apple II line, I support
all
 > hardware producers.
 > 
 > So, to the GSBarnDoor team, put me down for one.
 > 
 > And, I too am hoping they will see this.

Asking someone if they should consider is different then telling them
to redesign the damn thing. Its like i was holding a damn gun to
their heads or something. i am pissed on HOW they treated me and
responded towards me, THAT is why i i wont buy nothing from them. 

I could care less what anyone does, if you buy one more power to you.
but i wont support no one that treats people like that.

i am done on the subject. They was 100% rude towards me. they had no
reason to reply like they did period. they could have responded allot
nicer then they did.

and when i said 

 they should consider a card design over a drop in CPU
replacement

i meant that as a question not a demand in the email

it should have been put 

Should they consider a Card design over a CPU drop in replacement.

That is how it should have been.