Re: Tact, the Single Programmer, and the FAQs, Ma'am

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <iu39773@pro-aplbytrs.pro-nsdapple.cts.com>,
Nancy Crawford <nancyc@pro-aplbytrs.pro-nsdapple.cts.com> wrote:
>Whatever you may think of N.Mate's occasional somewhat surly attitude,
>maintaining and extending the FAQ is a time-consuming job and I don't
>recall -anyone- posting any thank-yous to him for his work. I have found
>his replies accurate and when he's goofed, he's admitted and fixed same.

   There have been a few thanks posted, a bunch more emailed. 
 
>Thank you, Nathan; I appreciate the FAQs and once my other local provider
>with text web-browser starts answering the darned phone again, I intend to
>catch an updated copy. I find the FAQs valuable to myself, and have made
>and provided copies to several people who haven't got access.

   Posted late last night (just a few hours into the first of the
month) in 4 parts to c.s.a2.

Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?  -R.A. Heinlein