When you can't prove anything, just flame

[nathan@mixer.visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <Edina1996Jul27.203612.19622@news3.idirect.com.compulink.com>,
Sid Stulberg <misty@idirect.com> wrote:
>CAn it be possible that Nathan Mates is being arrogant and conceited?  The
>][ to designate the "2" for Apple hasn't been used since the days of the
>II+, about twenty years ago. There is nothing wrong with my system and I
>certainly don't intend any more "fixes" to my system just to satisfy Mr.
>Mates.  But I'll bet he'll be stubborn enough or even sufficiently mean to
>continue using ][ which died years ago.

   I'd bet you have no clue what you're talking about. As to using ][
in message topics, a quick perusal of www.dejanews.com will show that
I have not started a topic with such characters in the past 2 months
(and that's roughly 290 messages). I did leave subject lines intact
for the few messages I replied to that did have such characters. 

   When I talk about the Apple II line, I talk about the following:
the IIGS, the //e, //c, IIc+, ][+, and Apple ][. Each based on what
its name tends to appear as on the case and/or startup screen.

   If you going to try and flame me or insinuate some garbage, make
sure it has a semblance of reality.

Nathan Mates