[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: floppy capacity question

Subject: Re: floppy capacity question
From: KILPATRICK@Tank.CYBERphile.co.uk (Richard)
Date: 1996/07/11
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Cyberphile
References: <4ptgpb$45e@news.pacifier.com> <4pu6or$rkn@usenet7.interramp.com> <4s199s$ffa@news.pacifier.com>
Reply-to: rtk@scotborders.co.uk

In article <4s199s$ffa@news.pacifier.com>, jimbell@pacifier.com (jimbell) says:
>
>Tom Zuchowski <cd003508@interramp.com> wrote:

>>16-sector tracks and upped it to 140K.

God, now I'm getting really pedandtic. 143K!

OK, I'm going. Don't throw those rotten Apples at me!

Richard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: floppy capacity question
  - From: nparker@cie-2.uoregon.edu (Neil Parker)
- Re: floppy capacity question
  - From: david@wraith.cs.uow.edu.au (David E A Wilson)
- Re: floppy capacity question
  - From: nathan@parka.winternet.com (Nathan Mates)

References:
- floppy capacity question
  - From: jimbell@pacifier.com (jimbell)
- Re: floppy capacity question
  - From: Tom Zuchowski <cd003508@interramp.com>
- Re: floppy capacity question
  - From: jimbell@pacifier.com (jimbell)

Prev by Date: Re: floppy capacity question
Next by Date: Re: Limited Edition GS's (Was: Re: Old v. late IIc)
Previous by thread: Re: floppy capacity question
Next by thread: Re: floppy capacity question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread