[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Otherwise stupid thread (was: "Off-topic correction")
- Subject: Re: Otherwise stupid thread (was: "Off-topic correction")
- From: louiss@gate.net (Louis Schulman)
- Date: 1996/07/07
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
- References: <BNCNtEp.mezzetti@delphi.com> <ADF9FA01-15737@192.0.2.1> <4r7eqc$orn@blackice.winternet.com> <Pine.SGI.3.91r.960701105925.26201A-100000@freenet>
- Reply-to: louiss@gate.net (Louis Schulman)
In <Pine.SGI.3.91r.960701105925.26201A-100000@freenet>, "David J. Gadow" <gadowv@freenet.msp.mn.us> writes:
>On 1 Jul 1996, Nathan Mates wrote:
>
>Snipped - a lot of flaming drivel
>>
>> Star Trek at least has the guts to say it's fiction when it says
>> 'reverse the polarity of the neutron field' [Some friends say that's
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> an actual line from some TNG episode, despite the fact that neutrons
>> have no charge]. Dr Tom, however, is still trying to act like it's
>> real. Many of us on the internet refuse to accept this blantant pack
>> of lies and mistruths from Dr. Tom and will keep forcing him to face
>> that he's lying in public.
>>
>> Nathan Mates
>>
>I know this is off-topic and a completely pointless post, but I can't
>help it. The phrase is 'Reverse the polarity of the neutron flow' and
>is actually from the longest-running science-fiction show in the history
>of television--Doctor Who.
>
>And now, back to your regularly scheduled flaming
>
>Dave
>
Your comments were ten times more worthwhile than all the flaming drivel that
gave rise to them. While I know one of the flamers (at least) is a substantial
contributor in Apple matters, this long-running waste of bandwidth has diminished
all its participants to reputation=zero.
I think the two of them should meet on the field on honor with flamethrowers, and
incinerate each other. Then, we can resume the purpose of this newsgroup.
Louis