[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proterm and the //E
- Subject: Re: Proterm and the //E
- From: nathan@parka.winternet.com (Nathan Mates)
- Date: 1996/07/01
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Winternet Corporation, Mpls, MN
- References: <4qm81i$aq3@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us> <4qmf3g$ma7@blackice.winternet.com> <swjackso-2606962103050001@ad11-115.compuserve.com>
In article <swjackso-2606962103050001@ad11-115.compuserve.com>,
Steve W. Jackson <swjackso@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >I have a //E with an 80 column card, I just tried running a copy of
>> >ProTerm on it and it says I need a 65C02 Processor?
>> >Anyone know anything about that?
>> It is saying that it wants an upgraded //e, or at least the upgraded
>> processor from a //e. You might be able to find an upgrade kit from
>> Alltech Electronics at (619) 721-7733.
>Nathan should know, being an Apple II demigod and all that, but isn't the
>correct term for a //e with a 65C02 an enhanced //e? Just a thought.
Demigod, eh? Sure beats a self-proclaimed Piled Higher & Deeper.
According to Apple Computer, Inc., the Apple //e upgrade kit was
4 chips: System ROM, video generation ROM, 65C02 processor, and one
other I can't remember off the top of my head. [Sorry, had maybe 14
hours of sleep since Wed morning. Just got back from a convention.]
Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~nathan/ <*>
# And he said to them, "To you has been given the secret of the
# Kingdom of God, but for those outside, everything comes in
# parables" Mark 4:11, NRSV