[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- Subject: Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- From: "Ian K. Erickson" <ierickson@ewu.edu>
- Date: 1996/05/01
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: A poorly-installed InterNetNews site
- References: <4lgnj3$n9@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us> <4lq986$2u6@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4ltd20$gfl@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4m2h2k$m8f@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us>
The Turing Test is a scientific circus act that only proves how easy it
is to fool people into thinking their computer is intelligent. People
are animistic by nature (read The Golden Bough by James Frazier) and
tend to emplicate things they don't understand in terms of their one
motives. Now, getting a computer to produce *verifyable* results of
cognition, that would be cool and a real *test* of a Turing/Von Neuman
machine.
The T-test isn't "meaningless." It just doesn't mean what the "human
interest" members of the media would like you to think. They, like
Turing, think you're easily fooled. :/
o \ o / __o __| \/ |__ o__ \ o / o
/|\ | /| __\o \o | o/ o/__ |\ | /|\
/ \ / \ |\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ / \ / \ / \
=================http://www.labs.ewu.edu/Cons/ierickson/ierickson.htm===========
Ian K. Erickson "The Latin word for 'Close your eyes and open your mouth'
ierickson@ewu.edu is Prospectus." - Dogbert the Almighty.