[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
- Subject: Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)
- From: chrisw@eagle.ais.net (Chris Wicklein)
- Date: 1996/05/04
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: American Information Systems, Inc.
- References: <4ma875$ob7@usenet4.interramp.com> <4mcs6h$55s@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
RUBYWAND (rubywand@aol.com) wrote:
: Will GS-X be "boat-anchor slow" in two years? three years? ... Not
: likely. Running a 200MHz RISC and with the capability for in-Slot
: acceleration (say, to 500MHz, 1GHz, ...) it will be able to 'muddle
: along' well enough. On-motherboard Video with no performance-killing data
: bottleneck is not an advantage easily overcome by any plug-in Video
: system.
Before last week, the last time I had heard the GSX discussed
seriously was during the very early 90s prior to the Twain. I'm not sure
why we're considering a system like you describe as a modern GSX. How
does this concept differ from adopting an existing platform, such as a
generic PPC box, and writing a 65816 emulator and intercepting all I/O
location accesses?
--
Chris Wicklein - EMAIL: chrisw@ais.net - URL: http://www.cl.ais.net/chrisw
"He strode down the hill amid the tumult of suddenrisen vapours of
wounded pride and fallen hope and baffled desire." -- James Joyce, POA