[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- Subject: Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- From: chrisw@eagle.ais.net (Chris Wicklein)
- Date: 1996/05/04
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: American Information Systems, Inc.
- References: <4m55d8$d8n@news.ysu.edu> <4m5k9s$kr1@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <4me70l$9r@news.vanderbilt.edu>
John Lesher (lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu) wrote:
: Nathan Mates (nathan@cco.caltech.edu) wrote:
: : In article <4m55d8$d8n@news.ysu.edu>,
: : Adalbert Goertz <be404@yfn.ysu.edu> wrote:
: When you're trying to put across an idea -- ANY IDEA -- you
: use any method to your disposal. You DO try to make your point as
: clear as possible. This is why there are rules in English -- to make
: transmitted ideas as clear as possible. But it is NOT THE END OF THE
: WORLD if you BREAK THE RULES. As long as the idea you are trying to
: transmit is sent, WHO CARES about grammar. Or speling :-).
7h3 pUrP05e 0f (0|\/||\/|u|\|1c4710n 15 2 B u|\|d3r5700d. Feel free
to express yourself any way you see fit, but don't be surprised if you're
ignored when you choose to communicate by non-standard methods. I rarely
read any post which doesn't attempt to employ standard English usage,
unless the poster is more fluent in another langauge ;)
--
Chris Wicklein - EMAIL: chrisw@ais.net - URL: http://www.cl.ais.net/chrisw
"He strode down the hill amid the tumult of suddenrisen vapours of
wounded pride and fallen hope and baffled desire." -- James Joyce, POA