[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- Subject: Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- From: nathan@cco.caltech.edu (Nathan Mates)
- Date: 1996/04/30
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- References: <4m55d8$d8n@news.ysu.edu>
In article <4m55d8$d8n@news.ysu.edu>,
Adalbert Goertz <be404@yfn.ysu.edu> wrote:
>>2) e.e. cummings you're not. Learn to capitalize, write full sentences
>>that are complete thoughts, and don't indent lines
>>randomly. Left-justified lines of 70 columns (except for indenting the
>>first line of a _paragraph_ 3-5 spaces) are the norm.
>> Authority: Strunk & White, an excellent grammatical book available
>>at finer bookstores everywhere.
>This tone is disgusting, but nothing new from Mr.Mates.
Once again, you prove that all you seem to care about is the tone,
not the facts presented in the posting. Fact is, English has rules,
and if you continuously and egregiously break them without being a
famous poet, you look stupid.
Do us all a big favor and learn to care about facts, not attitudes.
Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~nathan/ <*>
# And he said to them, "To you has been given the secret of the
# Kingdom of God, but for those outside, everything comes in
# parables" Mark 4:11, NRSV