Re: Hammacks are all puds

[treiter@comet.net (Toby Reiter)]

In article <4if0s9$c8_001@ind-005-236-218.iquest.net>,
bob@killfiles.are.helpless.com (Infinite Bob) wrote:

>treiter@comet.net (Toby "I need a hug" Reiter) wrote:
>
>>I t's really hard to offend a teenager with sexual trash--after all it's
>>our language, right?  Well, I'm offended. There is already too much sexual
>>confusion programmed into American society--we don't need it here.  It is
>>so deeply imbedded into society to look on sex in cheap and vulgar
>>manifestations to the point that it has lost all of its primary meaning as
>>an expression of love.  Love is beautiful in all of its manifestations,
>>but not when it recedees into vulgarity and verbal rape. Sorry, just my
>>personal opinion.
>
>Now Tobster, you're not one of those left-wing commie-pinko fag-loving 
>tree-saving bunny-hugging Al-Gore-Hoot-Owl-Avenging politically-correct 
>techno-dweebies, are you?
>
>Endless Mike
I would actually be one of those people that recognizes the basic humanity
of all people and am sexually secure enough to accept all forms of sexual
preference.   And yes, I am a socialist, environmentalist, sensitive, and
tolerant individual.......What's wrong with that, eh??!!! Just because I
recognize that the ego is not the end of all life doesn't mean I'm any
less of a person...just less of a bigot, that's all.

This brings up an interesting question: what does it mean when a person is
intolerant: is that something to be glorified?  Just because I'm
accepting, that makes me a bad person?????

-- 
"Happy trails to you, until..we meet...again......."
                   ___________
                         |OBYLARONIOUS
Lover of all things Apple ][.