[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II

Subject: Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II
From: Jordan Reiter <jreiter@comet.net>
Date: 1996/02/11
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Not me!
References: <Pine.PMDF.3.91.960206131905.4821358C-100000@ewu.edu> <4fc404$fll@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> <4fidah$1cq@urvile.msus.edu>
Reply-to: jreiter@comet.net

> : My vote for the *WORST* 5.25" disk drive Apple ever sold goes to the
> : DuoDisk.  No contest.  That thing is a DOG.  And now I am stuck with two
> : of 'em for my ][e's.
> 
>         Me too, I've got two of them for free, but they don't work...well
> I'm taking his word for it because I don't have a card or cable to test
> them with.

Really?  I've got one on my GS which seems to work O.k. Are they 
slower than other drives?  What's the major problem with them?

Toby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II
  - From: jd-wong@cs.uiuc.edu (Jim Wong)

References:
- Unidisk vs. Disk II
  - From: ierickson@ewu.edu
- Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II
  - From: dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff)
- Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II
  - From: schefflr@news.msus.edu (Bill Scheffler)

Prev by Date: grind ftp site
Next by Date: Re: PRODOS TO MSDOS
Previous by thread: Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II
Next by thread: Re: Unidisk vs. Disk II
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread