[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be



In article <42o4l7$9qt@news-2.csn.net>, bazyar@hypermall.com (Jawaid
Bazyar) wrote:

> Richard D. Wilson (wilsonr@gdls.com) wrote:
> 
> : Uhh-humm... Windoze? Warp? Gimme a break!
> 
> : Real programmers prefer real OS's (eg Linux / X). 
> : BTW, why is 'doze95 called 32 bit when it still has DOS crawling
around in its
> : guts? Actually, forget I asked. I don't want to know...
> 
>   That's because it doesn't still have "DOS crawling around in its guts".
> It can emulate DOS software much in the same way that Linux can. 
> And there's a "DOS Mode" available that's _only_ DOS. Everything
> in Win '95 is 32-bit; my SCSI drivers, video drivers, etc etc everything.
> And the main reason I'm liking Win '95 more and more is that I can
> do a lot of the things I do under Linux- and not have to reboot
> to use a decent word processor (sorry, LaTeX doesn't count).

I believe you're wrong Mr.Bazyar. Check out recent issues of BYTE and Info
World. I believe both confirmed the existence of 16 bit code in W95.
Anyone comment on this?

BTW. There is no need to be so rude and snotty in your replies. Whatever
else you think of the people and their computers in all these groups they
are for the most part as intelligent as you or I. If you want to argue,
fine. Just argue on the merits and facts. Not with crude remarks.

Thanks and have a nice day.

-- Lou Pecora

-- 
Lou Pecora
code 6341
Naval Research Lab
Washington  DC  20375
USA
pecora@zoltar.nrl.navy.mil
/* My views are not those of the U.S. Navy. 
   If you want their views, you have to go to war. */