[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be



In article <42giv5$3kl@news.corpcomm.net> "Stephen R. Davis" <sdavis@rapidcity.com> writes:
>From: "Stephen R. Davis" <sdavis@rapidcity.com>
>Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
>Date: 5 Sep 1995 04:16:37 GMT

>jdoe@somewhere.edu (me) wrote:
>>In article <42g0e7$kvs@itchy.itsnet.com>, jack@itsnet.com (Jack Hudler) wrote:
>>
>>> erik@hypermall.com (Erik Kloeppel) wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> >no, you  miss the point.  We have time for this fun BECAUSE OUR OS IS
>>> >STABLE and dosn't fill our days with constant <REBOOT>, <CRASH>,
>>> >and <DRIVER UNKNOWN> type problems.  We want to do something, we do it..
>>> >once done, while we wait for Windoze users to catch up, we play.
>>> 
>>> Catch up, hell!! Those tire tracks on you back have mark of Microsoft.
>>> Man your warpers really crack me up, if you haven't noticed yet market
>>> just left a crap on os2 and ran away. 
>>
>>Market share and performance are frequently unrelated in this world,
>>particularly in the case of OS's.  It is the consensus of most experts
>>that OS/2 Warp and Mac OS are definitely superior operating systems to
>>Win95.  But Win95 still gains market share because certain people are
>>stupid enough to believe Microsloth's advertising hype and go out and buy
>>it.  If we actually had consumers making RATIONAL decisions like the
>>market system requires then we wouldn't have this problem (fortunately
>>it's not MY problem...I don't use Win95!)  'Nuf said.

>If you don't use Windows 95, then what are you doing participating in this 
>newsgroup??? If you can't be constructive, stay out!

As I understand it, this group is a forum for discussing all windows-type 
operating environments, which includes Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 
3.11, MAC OS, OS/2, X Windows, and probably others, including Windows 95. It 
is not, as your comment implies, a Windows 95 only forum.