[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why did Apple switch to the 5.25 drives?

Subject: Re: Why did Apple switch to the 5.25 drives?
From: jd-wong@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jim Wong)
Date: 1995/04/19
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
References: <xqwe4Zy.rogtha@delphi.com> <mattb-1804951820450001@matt.gi.alaska.edu>

mattb@dino.gi.alaska.edu (Matt B) writes:
>Drive.  The card and cable were flakey at best and the drives were always
>screwed up.  The Apple 5.25" drive at least was a separated drive so if

Hmm.  I've had a DuoDisk for over ten years and haven't had any problems
with it.  The //e monitor that rested on it for most of its lifetime left
some interesting marks, though.
-- 
Jim Wong (jd-wong@uiuc.edu)

References:
- Why did Apple switch to the 5.25 drives?
  - From: rogtha@delphi.com
- Re: Why did Apple switch to the 5.25 drives?
  - From: mattb@dino.gi.alaska.edu (Matt B)

Prev by Date: Re: Apple //c & Disk II
Next by Date: Re: Just curious . . .
Previous by thread: Re: Why did Apple switch to the 5.25 drives?
Next by thread: Re: Why did Apple switch to the 5.25 drives?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread