Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?

[Warren Ernst <wernst@gmail.com>]

On Jan 19, 1:34 am, sporadic <sporadica...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 5:10 pm, Polymorph <mike.a.steph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 19, 11:42 am, sporadic <sporadica...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks Drew, I'll check it out this week and post the results.  TWGS
> > > is has more hardware (10Mhz/32K) than the ZipGS (8MHz/16K) and I'm
> > > going to see if someone at work can solder a socket on the Zip so I
> > > can swap the oscillator, put in a new 65816 and take it to 64K cache
> > > as well.
>
> > My adventures at upgrading my Zip GSX a couple of years ago might be
> > of some interest to you too:http://apple2.sytes.net/ZIP_GSX_Mod/index.html
>
> > Cheers,
> > Mike
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Excellent write up, thank you!  Since I have no soldering skills
> whatsoever, I took the coward's way out and order a couple of these
> from Digikey:http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?lang=en&site=US&;...
>
> Now I just gotta order the SRAMs from ReactiveMicro! Woot!
>
> Jimmy

I found it was a lot cheaper to get ZIF (zero insertion force) sockets
for the thinner-ram-in-the-fatter-sockets problem. The ZIF sockets go
into the .6 inch sockets yet can accommodate both .6 inch and .3 inch
chips. It makes the card a little thicker, but I haven't found this to
be a problem.

-Warr