[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BinSCII v2.0 ??????
In article <2i6c4a$rir@sleepy.cc.utexas.edu>,
Michael Foegelle <foegelle@sleepy.cc.utexas.edu> wrote:
>I never have quite understood why the Apple
>internet community didn't just go ahead and adopt UUENCODE like everyone
>else, although of course Apple users always must be different.. (Flame
>bait there I know, but..) Anyone know the history of Binscii?
BINSCII is more efficient than UUENCODE...
anyways... most other platforms are now moving to SHIP format, which is
also more efficient than UUENCODE, but I don't know how it compares to
binscii or the proposed binscii II
--
___ ___ ___ ___
mspaeth@magnusug.acs.ohio-state.edu |_ || _| / _ \/ _ \ Apple II Forever!
_| || |_ ( (_> <_) )
aa783@hela.ins.cwru.edu |___||___| \___/\___/ Macintosh? Never!