[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AppleWorks v4.0??



In article <26pv19$mih@news.ysu.edu>, Eric S. Ford <ag471@yfn.ysu.edu> wrote:
>
>In a previous article, bazyar@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (Jawaid Bazyar) says:
>
>>Authoritative? I've talked to Jerry Kindall at Quality, and AppleWorks 4.0
>>is a standalone package.
>
>Ah ha! Now this is the kind of answer I was expecting all along.  As was
>suggested, I guess I could have made the call myself but I presumed someone
>had already done so and would be able to put the info here for all to see.
>I never meant to create such a storm.  But then, dialogs such as these (with
>all their passion) are what has made the Apple II community such staunch
>supporters of their systems.  Sorta like the Coke vs Pepsi commercial where
>the crowd drinking one brand is rowdy and the other is BORING!  I like to think
>using the Apple II puts us in the rowdy crowd.
>
>
>-- 
>Eric S. Ford    ag471@yfn.ysu.edu

Unnecessary 'feather ruffling' is stupidity, IMO.
Sorry.
-- 
Tero Sand, 2 kyu		! Science is a process of enlarging one's
				! ignorance to dizzying heights.
EMail: cust_ts@cc.helsinki.fi	!	- D.C.Lindsay in talk.origins
       custts@cc.helsinki.fi	!