Re: Here we go again...

[fadden@uts.amdahl.com (Andy McFadden)]

In article <CD05rw.BEz@news.iastate.edu> irsman@iastate.edu (Ian Schmidt) writes:
>0.9b4, which is not scheduled to be released due to the returning flood of
>negativity,

Right.  Somebody posts a bug report, you act like an arrogant 8-year-old
and tell them to do something that is (for many people) anatomically
impossible, and

			** GOLLY **

you start getting negative reactions from the world at large.

For every negative reaction there is an equal and opposite... never mind.

>MODZap 0.9 includes a revolutionary self-syncronized swapper, which means it
>plays all samples at perfect fidelity.  However, due to the structure of the
>DOC, and limitations of the source hardware (Amiga), looping samples tend to
>be a bit rough around the loopback point.

So it plays perfect sound so long as the input is what you expect it to be?

If player (a) plays the songs I want to play without buzzes and clicks,
while REVOLUTIONARY PERFECTO SUPER-DUPER-MEGA ADVANCED AS ALL HELL player (b)
can't hack it, how can player (b) be considered superior?

You can't design and program in a vacuum.  If your design doesn't work
with the //gs hardware, then your design is inferior to the ones that do,
no matter how sophisticated it may be.

-- 
fadden@uts.amdahl.com (Andy McFadden)
[ Above opinions are mine, Amdahl has nothing to do with them, etc, etc. ]