[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)

Subject: Re: Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)
From: fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 17:32:54 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: EMG
References: <241jl4$cs5@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1993Aug8.061314.5920@ntmtv> <1993Aug11.120815.13753@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>

Can Turbo IDE & RamFAST co-exist peacefully in one machine?  

-- 
frank m. lin
fmlin@netcom.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)
  - From: behrenss@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Soenke Behrens)

References:
- Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad
  - From: szatezal@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Shane M Zatezalo)
- Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)
  - From: blasjw@ntmtv.com (Joseph Blas)
- Re: Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)
  - From: behrenss@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Soenke Behrens)

Prev by Date: Mystery Card In Apple II+
Next by Date: Ressurecting Disks part 2 / Zip Chip //c
Previous by thread: Re: Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)
Next by thread: Re: Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread