[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brutal Deluxe's MountIt will soon go 1.2



On 5 sep, 04:17, Toinet <antoine.vig...@laposte.net> wrote:
> On 5 sep, 02:27, schmidtd <schmi...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 4, 8:09 pm, Sheppy <the.she...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 4, 4:24 pm, Toinet <antoine.vig...@laposte.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi All,
>
> > > > Now that I have a 1.2 version of MountIt with removable devices and
> > > > other bugs removed (yep, there were), I was wondering whether I would
> > > > remove the ability to mount the same disk image twice (ie. I compare
> > > > the pathnames)
>
> > > > - Do you want me to keep the check and prevent you from loading the
> > > > same image twice or shall I remove the check?
>
> > > Don't remove the check; there are too many risks involved when
> > > mounting the same image twice, unless they're mounted read-only and
> > > don't let you write the changes back.
>
> > Once it's virtualized on the GS, it's not written back to anything...
> > it's all in memory.  And GSOS wouldn't let you mount two disks named
> > the same - it would make you rename (or eject) one of them.
>
> You are both right and that is what is happening: GS/OS asks you to
> rename the second device.
>
> The problem here is that both images share the same GS/OS pathname. If
> you update them by writing their data back to disk (I recall I do that
> backwards: latest mounted to first mounted thus allowing images within
> images updates), then you may lose a lot of information...
>
> If I mount the second image in a read only mode, then it cannot be
> renamed then you will have to eject it, the pathname check is of no
> use...
>
> That is why I ask and I still don't have a clue for that one,
>
> antoine

Let's say we are in 1.1.9999999999:
- disk images are now removable
- up to 16 disk images can be mounted

I still have an annoying bug. That is a human bug due to my
understanding and handling of the "mount disk" and "disk switch" bits
and behaviour. Pfou.. I am sure I am at 3 bytes to the end...

A good old sheet of paper, a pencil and everything will be better in
our beautiful "swine flu" world.

Atchoum,

Antoine