MdntTrain wrote:
I think... both sides have valid arguments to an extent. - PaulNo, both sides do not have valid arguments. Feedback is for aspects of the item and the seller's performance in conveying that item to the buyer -- it's not for stuff outside the transaction. Ramito didn't do anything wrong by soliciting advice here, and he performed on the transaction. So, in the end, wasn't Buttholz's feedback *on that transaction* purely malicious and retaliatory?
One can argue that delaying for a week an item that was payed for does constitute an issue *on that transaction*. Anyway no real damage done to either side. Move on! -Alex.