[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Adt(pro)




"Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote in message D9qdndsNY7Bgxk7VnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@comcast.com">news:D9qdndsNY7Bgxk7VnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@comcast.com...

"David Wilson" <mcs6502@gmail.com> wrote in message
e4e95c56-ec03-4414-858c-4b691ab140e4@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com">news:e4e95c56-ec03-4414-858c-4b691ab140e4@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Yes, but...

1) You will need hardware flow control as the 6551 only has a one byte
input buffer.
2) My Rockwell manual does not show this but I seem to recall that
some (all?) 6551 chips will corrupt the byte currently being sent if
CTS is deasserted mid-character - the 65C51 does not have this
problem.
3) You really need an accelerator card/chip to take advantage of the
higher throughput. As usual, you made the assumption that I implied that I would want my modem set to 115,200 baud, and I did not. If I had meant that, I would have said, "to these settings". ;-) I try to say what I mean, and mean what I say, and have come to the conclusion that people don't hear correctly. ;-)


Sorry, David, it's 4:00 am here. I am a bit on edge.
Bill Garber from GS-Electronics
http://www.garberstreet.com

"If you wish to forget anything on the spot, make a note that this thing is to be remembered." (Edgar Allen Poe)