[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: AE RamKeeper
- Subject: Re: Q: AE RamKeeper
- From: schmidtd <schmidtd@my-deja.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- Injection-info: a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.26.71.36; posting-account=_InY0QkAAABEJlD5gzff1o2kxpwa79I3
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- References: <-PadnfQmf-IuK8PVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
- User-agent: G2/1.0
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:1185
On Jun 22, 4:31 pm, Steven Hirsch <snhir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I picked up an AE RamKeeper on eBay recently and have just gotten around to
> trying it. Unfortunately, it does not seem to cooperate very well. I'm using
> a Rom 3 GS with ZipGSX accelerator (12.5Mhz) and a RamFast Rev D controller in
> Slot 7. I have been through, variously, a 4MB Chinook Ram 4000, AE GS-Ram 4MB
> and an older Apple GS memory card with 1MB. With any/all of these, I hear the
> boot-up boink, followed by an error message from the RamKeeper firmware about
> "Bad RK configuration - Error 103".
I have a RamKeeper which I labeled as "bad" in my inventory - it's got
the 1.3 ROM, but works perfectly well with a ROM01 machine, now that I
try it. So, it looks like it's the 1.3 AE ROM that's in conflict with
the GS ROM03. I have an AE RK1.7 chip too, but just the one - maybe
we can have one of our vendors run a copy for us?
> The RK is fitted with what looks like a home-blown EPROM marked Rev 1.3 in
> pencil on a piece of masking tape.
They all look that way. The glue doesn't hold on the stickers that AE
put on them Oh, and by the way... my AE RK 1.7 chip actually says 1.7
(I still have the official AE sticker for that one) - but the CDA
announces itself as 1.6.