[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fantavision 2.1?

Subject: Re: Fantavision 2.1?
From: limtc <thyechean@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.156.11.1; posting-account=xPI8rAoAAABxyK8KyUIiYChvvtqAeJGI
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <5bb061f6-0bb9-4f23-80e1-5d2e289f8f99@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <69137e04-1fe5-4188-8ec5-ba10294b81af@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <cf2r041l3f8eohrppgq72d5l207qit4jeg@4ax.com> <48127fcd$0$17511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:34591

Since you have the original "2.1", can you help test on ROM 3 and
harddisk and see any differences from 1.0?

On 4月26日, 上午9时05分, Alex Lee <ale...@mac.com> wrote:

> A fake!? Mitch I'm disappointed in you! :-)
>
> The image that appears on the archive is an image made from an original
> Fantavision disk, which was a lab pack version I bought very cheaply
> back in 1992. It hasn't been sector edited or altered in anyway...I
> think :-) I got the Fantavision box out and unfortunately, there's no
> information regarding the version 2.1 features.
>
> --
> - Alexhttp://www.whatisthe2gs.apple2.org.za/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fantavision 2.1?
  - From: limtc <thyechean@gmail.com>

References:
- Fantavision 2.1?
  - From: limtc <thyechean@gmail.com>
- Re: Fantavision 2.1?
  - From: limtc <thyechean@gmail.com>
- Re: Fantavision 2.1?
  - From: Mitchell Spector <mitch2gs@hotmail.com>
- Re: Fantavision 2.1?
  - From: Alex Lee <alelee@mac.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Fantavision 2.1?
Next by Date: Re: Apple II vs Atari 800
Previous by thread: Re: Fantavision 2.1?
Next by thread: Re: Fantavision 2.1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread