[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3.5" disk interleaf

Subject: Re: 3.5" disk interleaf
From: "sfahey" <sfahey@a2central.com.remove-hrt-this>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:46:35 GMT
In-reply-to: <7248b871-5bea-4567-86f2-2dfd2f923844@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: A2Central.com
References: <7248b871-5bea-4567-86f2-2dfd2f923844@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Thread-index: AciMUTkzd/4NIPhEEdybIAAWy88OUA==
Thread-topic: 3.5" disk interleaf
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:33441

  To: aiiadict
"aiiadict" <aiiadict@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 22, 10:35ï¿½am, Rich <nos...@saddam.net> wrote:
>> As I recall, 1:2 will produce a faster reading disk and is probably just
>> as reliable as 1:4. ï¿½Do I remember this correctly?
> 
> if you search this newsgroup, you will find a discussion about this
> that took place in 2008

Be sure to use "interleave" in the search string.

But if you're in a hurry:

Apple 3.5 ... 2:1 (platinum)
UniDisk 3.5 ... 4:1 (snow white)
--- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 NewsLink 1.85
A2Central.com - Your total source for Apple II computing.

References:
- Re: 3.5" disk interleaf
  - From: aiiadict@gmail.com

Prev by Date: Re: Installing CP/M on a ProFile drive
Next by Date: Re: Apple IIGS to TV?
Previous by thread: Re: 3.5" disk interleaf
Next by thread: Help needed: New GS disks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread