[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?

Subject: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser@floodgap.com>
Date: 31 Dec 2007 10:16:02 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Eight Bit Subversives Planning To Replace All PCs with C64s, Inc.
References: <0d224663-1203-4ad5-b2b4-c026780a944c@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <15379068-b7c5-4937-83a4-80b862bf950d@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <13ngjv8q3vqptc0@corp.supernews.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.cbm:43368 comp.sys.apple2:31541

"Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com> writes:

>True enough.  The "pinnacle" of 8 bit development was either the Apple IIgs or 
>Commodore 128D...

The small nitpick being, of course, that the IIgs had a 65816, so it was not
running in 8-bit mode all the time (and my IIgs is not running in 8-bit
emulation even most of the time for the typical applications I use on it).

--
      Cameron Kaiser * ckaiser@floodgap.com * posting with a Commodore 128
                 personal page: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/
  ** Computer Workshops: games, productivity software and more for C64/128! **
                  ** http://www.armory.com/%7Espectre/cwi/ **

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: David Murray <adric22@yahoo.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com>

References:
- C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: Harry Potter <maspethrose7@aol.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: Pheuque <Ratteler@gmail.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: ANN: new version of dsktool.rb released
Next by Date: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Previous by thread: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Next by thread: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread